Patients and their relatives describe dissatisfaction with information about recovery outlook following stroke, including how much recovery might take place and when it might be expected. These issues often arise during rehabilitation, but research suggests that stroke unit staff lack the confidence and skills to discuss recovery and may avoid doing so. However, information about recovery is important for stroke survivors and their families, because it helps them make decisions about their life after stroke and future care.
Background
Aims & Objectives
This project aimed to understand how recovery is currently discussed in stroke units and how patients, carers and staff experience providing and receiving it, to inform development of a complex intervention.
Methods
We explored current practice using focused ethnographic case study methods in two stroke units. We conducted non-participant observations of opportunities for conversations about recovery, and interviewed patients, carers and stroke unit professionals. We also analysed relevant documents, including patients records and unit policies. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify and synthesised existing studies relating to patients’, carers’ and professionals’ views and experiences, and the effectiveness of existing strategies to improve provision. We then used the Behaviour Change Wheel to begin development of an intervention to improve the provision of information about recovery by stroke unit staff to patients and their families. Finally, we conducted an online survey of stroke professionals, to gather their feedback on the proposed intervention strategies
Findings and Impacts
A complex range of factors impacted the consistency, quality, and delivery of information about recovery on stroke units. These included the hospital and stroke unit environment, how the multidisciplinary team worked together to plan and provide information, the uncertainties of stroke recovery, and individual differences in patients’ and carers’ abilities and needs. Patients and carers described mixed experiences of receiving information. They wanted staff to be proactive in discussing the subject of recovery with them and wanted information to be provided honestly and with positivity and compassion. Some professionals felt they lacked the skills and confidence to discuss recovery, and that they didn’t have enough knowledge of the benefits of doing so. We were unable to identify any existing interventions to improve provision of information about recovery in neurological conditions from existing literature. Professionals perceived that receiving practical advice and demonstrations of communication skills, as well as MDT support would help to address the barriers they faced in discussing recovery.
Since completing this work, we have received further funding to continue development of our intervention, working alongside stroke survivors, carers and staff to design materials and implementation plans (the FORECAST study: https://ageingstrokeresearch.org/research-projects/development-of-an-intervention-to-improve-provision-of-information-about-recovery-on-the-stroke-unit/).
Partners & Collaborators
Investigators
Clarke D, Forster A, Tyson S, Burton L.
Lead Researcher:
Louisa-Jane Burton
Academic Supervisors:
Dr David Clarke
Dr Judith Johnson
Dr Tom Crocker
Prof Anne Forster
Outputs
Published papers:
Burton L-J, Forster A, Johnson J, Crocker TF, Tyson S, Clarke DJ. What influences provision of information about recovery on stroke units? A focused ethnographic case study. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;126:108331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108331
Burton L, Forster A, Johnson J, Crocker TF, Tyson SF, Wray F, Clarke DJ. Experiences and views of receiving and delivering information about recovery in acquired neurological conditions: a systematic review of qualitative literature. BMJ Open 2021;11:e045297. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045297
Thesis:
Burton, L. (2024). Talking about recovery after stroke: How do we do it, and can we do it better? PhD thesis, University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/34683/
Timescales
01/09/2017 – 31/03/2021
Funding agency
The Stroke Association’s Postgraduate Fellowship Scheme
(ref: TSA PGF 2017-02)
Outputs
Further information
For further information contact please visit: https://www.stroke.org.uk/research/how-can-we-improve-talking-about-recovery-stroke-unit
Or contact: Louisa Burton